Monday, January 18, 2010
ESPN on the XBOX
If this rumor about ESPN streaming live sporting events to the XBOX is true, then I officially have no reason to pay for cable. Right now, I could be perfectly happy with cable on Saturdays and Sundays (and select Mondays and Thursdays (stupid midweek football)) from September through February. That's all I need. I would be willing to wait for the DVDs of my favorite shows to come out before I watched them. And if Netflix continues improving the options for streaming content, then a simple $9 subscription could net me a season's-worth of catch-up (not ketchup) for my scripted sci-fi (or SyFy...Hey, I'm Imagining Greater) sweet-tooth. (That last sentence was really difficult to say for an ex-Blockbuster employee)
Random Thoughts
This link will take you to a page with actual Pat Robertson quotes. After reading these ten gems, how can anyone stand behind this man? He stands in his immaculate conception studio spouting his bigoted hate-speech and people listen to him, and agree with him, because he invokes God? I don't wish ill to anyone, but if this man would have personally experienced any of the situations that he has trivialized over the years, I dare say he might keep his mouth shut.
Haitians worship the devil? Hurricanes are a response for homosexuality? Liberal media is worse than the Holocaust? Feminists "leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians"? This guy is perfect for some dick-wad suit on The Office. But for someone who is supposed to be living a promoting Christianity I think he's been severely miscast. Like Hayden Christensen as Anakin bad. (and I actually liked the prequels, just not Hayden's acting)
Haitians worship the devil? Hurricanes are a response for homosexuality? Liberal media is worse than the Holocaust? Feminists "leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians"? This guy is perfect for some dick-wad suit on The Office. But for someone who is supposed to be living a promoting Christianity I think he's been severely miscast. Like Hayden Christensen as Anakin bad. (and I actually liked the prequels, just not Hayden's acting)
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Conan
Am I the only person who thinks that Jay Leno is massively over-rated? (that's rhetorical by the way) For my money, Conan O'Brien is the funniest, most entertaining, most engaging late night host I've personally watched. I say this having never actually watched Jimmy Fallon's show. I enjoy most of what he's done and love the fact that he treats video game releases and nerd website editors like other shows treat movie releases and reality TV stars. (plus - THE ROOTS!!!) I just can't bring myself to stay up until 12:30 when I have to get up early the next morning to go solve world hunger reset some guy's password.
I'm sure Leno didn't have the massive following that he ended with when he first started. (also known as people who fell asleep watching E.R. or their late local news) Could any late night host be any farther from the legend Leno replaced? But NBC stuck with him because they just completely screwed the guy who should have taken over (this guy, who, by the way, is way funnier than Leno). Pulling the plug before he got a chance to carve out his place in late night would be premature and inappropriate.
Flash forward (not FlashForward, that's ABC) 17 years and NBC is in a similar situation. Except they've compounded the problem by hanging onto one guy too long, giving up on one guy too soon, and wanting to push a third guy even later into the morning. Giving Leno a show at 11:35 and pushing Conan and Fallon back a half hour would be a terrible move. What happens in five years when Leno wants to retire? Does NBC replace him with some other half hour comedy and keep the new air-times? Or do the revert back to the timeslots that were good enough for the show's first seven decades and try to pretend like they didn't completely screw everyone involved? (Yes, 2010 marks the beginning of the seventh decade to see the Tonight Show)
I'm sure I'm not the first person to suggest Comedy Central as a remedy to this corporate clusterfuck. Apparently Stephen Colbert even offered Conan his timeslot last night. I'm not sure whether he was serious or not (and honestly, sometimes it's hard to tell with Colbert) but I think it's a brilliant idea. Move the Colbert Report to 10:30, keep the Daily Show at 11:00, and give Conan the 11:30 timeslot on a network that knows how to stick behind talent. I would gladly watch this two hour block of comedy gold on a nightly basis. (Okay, let's be honest. I would probably fall asleep with my TV on that station. But does it really matter to the network whether anyone is actually watching the TV that's tuned to their station? I think not. In fact, wouldn't they rather the person be asleep so that they wouldn't be temped to change the channel when a commercial comes on? I think yes.) With this late night block in place, Comedy Central would absolutely dominate that two hour block with the 18-35 demographic.
I don't want to hear about it being a cable network. Just look at the last several years' Emmy and Golden Globe nominees and winners. Plenty of cable networks there.
I just think this is the best way for NBC to get Leno back on the Tonight Show (everyone knows that's what they both want anyway). And it's also a way for Conan to tell them to shove their new timeslot and go steal a ton of viewers in the process. And did anyone see when these three appeared on each others shows? It was a large portion of the afore mentioned Comedy Gold.
Conan, please accept this open letter as a formal request to prove, finally, that talented, charasmatic people can triumph in the face of safe, overly politically correct, corporate homogenization.
I'm sure Leno didn't have the massive following that he ended with when he first started. (also known as people who fell asleep watching E.R. or their late local news) Could any late night host be any farther from the legend Leno replaced? But NBC stuck with him because they just completely screwed the guy who should have taken over (this guy, who, by the way, is way funnier than Leno). Pulling the plug before he got a chance to carve out his place in late night would be premature and inappropriate.
Flash forward (not FlashForward, that's ABC) 17 years and NBC is in a similar situation. Except they've compounded the problem by hanging onto one guy too long, giving up on one guy too soon, and wanting to push a third guy even later into the morning. Giving Leno a show at 11:35 and pushing Conan and Fallon back a half hour would be a terrible move. What happens in five years when Leno wants to retire? Does NBC replace him with some other half hour comedy and keep the new air-times? Or do the revert back to the timeslots that were good enough for the show's first seven decades and try to pretend like they didn't completely screw everyone involved? (Yes, 2010 marks the beginning of the seventh decade to see the Tonight Show)
I'm sure I'm not the first person to suggest Comedy Central as a remedy to this corporate clusterfuck. Apparently Stephen Colbert even offered Conan his timeslot last night. I'm not sure whether he was serious or not (and honestly, sometimes it's hard to tell with Colbert) but I think it's a brilliant idea. Move the Colbert Report to 10:30, keep the Daily Show at 11:00, and give Conan the 11:30 timeslot on a network that knows how to stick behind talent. I would gladly watch this two hour block of comedy gold on a nightly basis. (Okay, let's be honest. I would probably fall asleep with my TV on that station. But does it really matter to the network whether anyone is actually watching the TV that's tuned to their station? I think not. In fact, wouldn't they rather the person be asleep so that they wouldn't be temped to change the channel when a commercial comes on? I think yes.) With this late night block in place, Comedy Central would absolutely dominate that two hour block with the 18-35 demographic.
I don't want to hear about it being a cable network. Just look at the last several years' Emmy and Golden Globe nominees and winners. Plenty of cable networks there.
I just think this is the best way for NBC to get Leno back on the Tonight Show (everyone knows that's what they both want anyway). And it's also a way for Conan to tell them to shove their new timeslot and go steal a ton of viewers in the process. And did anyone see when these three appeared on each others shows? It was a large portion of the afore mentioned Comedy Gold.
Conan, please accept this open letter as a formal request to prove, finally, that talented, charasmatic people can triumph in the face of safe, overly politically correct, corporate homogenization.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Cinema
I have been extremely lax on staying current with movies. But in the last couple of weeks I have made an effort to see several movies that I missed throughout the year (I guess I have to say last year now). This will probably be a lengthy post so I'll talk about the others later.
First up was Avatar (not Avatar). We had a difficult time deciding between that one and Sherlock Holmes. But the deciding factor was the cinema experience. I figured Sherlock Holmes would be equally great or disappointing (which is sure to be damn near impossible with the people involved) whether we watched it on the big screen or on our mammoth 32" TV at home. But a movie like Avatar, especially in 3D, would suffer a visual beating, worthy of a sure-fire Oscar-winning performance by Hillary Swank (no one takes an on-screen beating like her), if we forced its fetish-in-waiting Na'vi onto our screen.
The main and side plots are nothing revolutionary, but they're also not as derivative as some reviews made it sound. Many parts were somewhat predictable but just as many twists were unexpected. The acting was superb (as superb as one can be playing clichéd stereotypes with myriad explosions all around). But the cinematography and visual effects are where this movie shines. Many times (I lost count how many) I couldn't tell whether some elements of the shot were real or digital. And these weren't easy things to digitally render. Moving trees/waterfalls and the like.
I'm still not sure how I feel about this. On one hand I'm super excited that technology has gotten to that point. But I also understand that means that actors will now stand in a green room and talk to themselves for a month or so during filming and then see the finished product when we do. I'm not actor, but I can't help but think this will harm the art of acting. I remember great acting moments just as much as great action moments. I'll never forget working at Blockbuster and having someone mention Heat. Being incredibly ignorant of most cinema when I was hired, I had never heard of it. Sitting down to watch this movie, and coming upon a scene with Pacino and De Niro sitting across from each other, acting their asses off, really made an impression. If you haven't seen it, just buy it. You'll want to see it a few more times.
(Side Note: As someone who has played MMORPGs for many years I have seen my fair share of horribly rendered water. However, I am currently playing Lord of the Rings Online and I most definitely does not suffer from this affliction (not Affliction). I have been consistently impressed with nearly everything in my almost three years of playing. I can't give Turbine enough praise for how they've run the game from beta through now.)
At one point in the movie I shifted in my seat (it is 150 minutes after all) and leaned my elbows on my knees. I reached up to swat some dust away from my face twice before I realized it wasn't dust; at least not any that I could actually touch. The 3D effects are incredibly subtle in this movie. I am by no means a 3D movie connoisseur. But every 3D movie I've seen, save for Avatar, has used the effects as nothing more than a gimmick.
Also, scale would normally be an issue when dealing with the size differences of things that are in this movie. I absolutely love the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but there are a few times in the films when something just looks...off, with respect to the scale. Nothing looks wrong but it just doesn't lock in. That was never an issue in Avatar. You're made to experience the queasiness of seeing something so large it breaks your sense of scale completely. This movie makes you feel scale in the pit of your stomach. This feeling and the 3D effects combine beautifully in one early scene in particular. A giant, and I mean giant, vehicle rolls onto screen and you see people in jeeps (or something similar) in the foreground. The scene lasts longer than a normal shot of this nature would and I think it's for the sole reason of letting you totally take in the scale. But rather than put the mammoth vehicle in a gimmicky 3D shot, Cameron uses the effects on the tiny foreground elements in the bottom right-hand corner. This effectively pulls your eyes to that part of the screen and forces you to refocus when you look at the background. My descriptions don't do it justice but you'll understand when you see it. Nothing really happens in the scene but it still sticks in my mind.
I don't like to give stars or thumbs or bald, naked, gold men but I did enjoy the movie. I would watch it again and recommended it to others.
First up was Avatar (not Avatar). We had a difficult time deciding between that one and Sherlock Holmes. But the deciding factor was the cinema experience. I figured Sherlock Holmes would be equally great or disappointing (which is sure to be damn near impossible with the people involved) whether we watched it on the big screen or on our mammoth 32" TV at home. But a movie like Avatar, especially in 3D, would suffer a visual beating, worthy of a sure-fire Oscar-winning performance by Hillary Swank (no one takes an on-screen beating like her), if we forced its fetish-in-waiting Na'vi onto our screen.
The main and side plots are nothing revolutionary, but they're also not as derivative as some reviews made it sound. Many parts were somewhat predictable but just as many twists were unexpected. The acting was superb (as superb as one can be playing clichéd stereotypes with myriad explosions all around). But the cinematography and visual effects are where this movie shines. Many times (I lost count how many) I couldn't tell whether some elements of the shot were real or digital. And these weren't easy things to digitally render. Moving trees/waterfalls and the like.
I'm still not sure how I feel about this. On one hand I'm super excited that technology has gotten to that point. But I also understand that means that actors will now stand in a green room and talk to themselves for a month or so during filming and then see the finished product when we do. I'm not actor, but I can't help but think this will harm the art of acting. I remember great acting moments just as much as great action moments. I'll never forget working at Blockbuster and having someone mention Heat. Being incredibly ignorant of most cinema when I was hired, I had never heard of it. Sitting down to watch this movie, and coming upon a scene with Pacino and De Niro sitting across from each other, acting their asses off, really made an impression. If you haven't seen it, just buy it. You'll want to see it a few more times.
(Side Note: As someone who has played MMORPGs for many years I have seen my fair share of horribly rendered water. However, I am currently playing Lord of the Rings Online and I most definitely does not suffer from this affliction (not Affliction). I have been consistently impressed with nearly everything in my almost three years of playing. I can't give Turbine enough praise for how they've run the game from beta through now.)
At one point in the movie I shifted in my seat (it is 150 minutes after all) and leaned my elbows on my knees. I reached up to swat some dust away from my face twice before I realized it wasn't dust; at least not any that I could actually touch. The 3D effects are incredibly subtle in this movie. I am by no means a 3D movie connoisseur. But every 3D movie I've seen, save for Avatar, has used the effects as nothing more than a gimmick.
Also, scale would normally be an issue when dealing with the size differences of things that are in this movie. I absolutely love the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but there are a few times in the films when something just looks...off, with respect to the scale. Nothing looks wrong but it just doesn't lock in. That was never an issue in Avatar. You're made to experience the queasiness of seeing something so large it breaks your sense of scale completely. This movie makes you feel scale in the pit of your stomach. This feeling and the 3D effects combine beautifully in one early scene in particular. A giant, and I mean giant, vehicle rolls onto screen and you see people in jeeps (or something similar) in the foreground. The scene lasts longer than a normal shot of this nature would and I think it's for the sole reason of letting you totally take in the scale. But rather than put the mammoth vehicle in a gimmicky 3D shot, Cameron uses the effects on the tiny foreground elements in the bottom right-hand corner. This effectively pulls your eyes to that part of the screen and forces you to refocus when you look at the background. My descriptions don't do it justice but you'll understand when you see it. Nothing really happens in the scene but it still sticks in my mind.
I don't like to give stars or thumbs or bald, naked, gold men but I did enjoy the movie. I would watch it again and recommended it to others.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Windows 7
Let me start this by saying that I try to let the hype die down before I jump on any new technology.
However, $29.99 for an operating system is where I draw the line on rational decisions. Financial planning and cautioned spending in the face of the new hotness felt like someone telling me that dark chocolate covered nipples were off the menu because of the carbs. Soul-crushing and just plain wrong. So I waved good-bye to eating anything other than a ham sandwich (and certainly no dark chocolate covered nipples....as far as I know) for a week, snatched my debit card from it's pleather sheath, and bought myself some of that Windows 7.
Seeing a normally expensive piece of software go for so cheap usually means it's languishing in some plywood bin at Wal-Mart. And for all I know, 7 will be there by Easter (just in time for themed baskets complimented with with seven chocolate eggs, Se7en, and 7UP). But a curious thing happened after I boldly slapped F12 and booted from the (self-made) disc: Everything worked. The wording of the options needed a little clarification but that's probably just me wanting technical jargon rather than options written by Dora the Explorer. After logging in for the first time, I began to see why the beta was getting such good reviews. Windows 7 seems to be as stable, if not more so, than my XP machine was and it retains the eye candy-ness of Vista.
(Side Note: People that pronounce it Veesta absolutely crack me up. Vista is a real word people! You think Microsoft paid someone to come up with a trendy, buzz-word type name for their OS? I'll take Vista any day over OSX or Ubuntu. Try having a rational adult conversation with a non-computer person and see which of the three names you'd like to try to say with a straight face.)
I don't know what it is about this blog but every time I start to pick a topic for my next blog the potential subject rebels and smites me with its nonoperative ways. I went home last week to finish mynerd Windows 7 blog and my PC started to only report six of my eight GBs of RAM. After visually making sure the RAM sticks are securely in place I turn the PC back on only to find that I now have no video. So like any good geek I turned it off, cracked it open, and started poking around. One hour, two monitors, and a metric ton of mumbled curses later, I still have no video. So I made a (somewhat) rational conclusion that the on-board video card must have gone bad.
Now normally I love to find excuses to spend money on computer parts. But Christmas was dueling my inner nerd in an epic battle of Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard, Spock. (or whatever Japanese game with pointy-haired, effeminate, card-throwing adolescent boys yelling about attack points and monsters passes for popular these days. Really. Look it up. I challenge you to Google for ten minutes and NOT to find six different shows that fit that description. Also, can you tell I have a five-year-old son at home?)
Cut to last night, I get my new XFX Radeon 4770 card (I only remember that because it was last night and it was written in about 419 places) out of the box and carefully put it in the tower. By the Way
, this card is a monster. It's like the K2 of video cards. Huge. Anyway, I turn on the PC, same video problem. More poking and mumbled cursing ensue and I finally called my drummer. (Did I mention I'm in a band? Did I mention we're called Porcelain Paradox? Did I mention we haven't posted new songs in over a year or that the songs on our page are old-ass demos? Did I mention that I just remembered to fire our webmaster? Did I mention we're playing our first show in almost a year, with our new bass player, at Patrick Sullivan's on Friday, February 12th? No? Well...someone should.) After a few minutes he says it could be the motherboard but I should try messing with the RAM again just to make sure. So I remove all four sticks of RAM and replace them one by one, with restarts in-between, and.......it works. Sweet dark chocolate covered nipples it works!
I equally love and hate computers. I feel like getting Love and Hate tattooed on my fingers but not on the knuckles like everyone else. I want them tattooed on my finger tips so I cannever get a job show my keyboard my feelings by typing with the hand that currently has the most appropriate saying.
Flawless and non-consequential plan.
Seeing a normally expensive piece of software go for so cheap usually means it's languishing in some plywood bin at Wal-Mart. And for all I know, 7 will be there by Easter (just in time for themed baskets complimented with with seven chocolate eggs, Se7en, and 7UP). But a curious thing happened after I boldly slapped F12 and booted from the (self-made) disc: Everything worked. The wording of the options needed a little clarification but that's probably just me wanting technical jargon rather than options written by Dora the Explorer. After logging in for the first time, I began to see why the beta was getting such good reviews. Windows 7 seems to be as stable, if not more so, than my XP machine was and it retains the eye candy-ness of Vista.
(Side Note: People that pronounce it Veesta absolutely crack me up. Vista is a real word people! You think Microsoft paid someone to come up with a trendy, buzz-word type name for their OS? I'll take Vista any day over OSX or Ubuntu. Try having a rational adult conversation with a non-computer person and see which of the three names you'd like to try to say with a straight face.)
I don't know what it is about this blog but every time I start to pick a topic for my next blog the potential subject rebels and smites me with its nonoperative ways. I went home last week to finish my
Now normally I love to find excuses to spend money on computer parts. But Christmas was dueling my inner nerd in an epic battle of Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard, Spock. (or whatever Japanese game with pointy-haired, effeminate, card-throwing adolescent boys yelling about attack points and monsters passes for popular these days. Really. Look it up. I challenge you to Google for ten minutes and NOT to find six different shows that fit that description. Also, can you tell I have a five-year-old son at home?)
Cut to last night, I get my new XFX Radeon 4770 card (I only remember that because it was last night and it was written in about 419 places) out of the box and carefully put it in the tower. By the Way
, this card is a monster. It's like the K2 of video cards. Huge. Anyway, I turn on the PC, same video problem. More poking and mumbled cursing ensue and I finally called my drummer. (Did I mention I'm in a band? Did I mention we're called Porcelain Paradox? Did I mention we haven't posted new songs in over a year or that the songs on our page are old-ass demos? Did I mention that I just remembered to fire our webmaster? Did I mention we're playing our first show in almost a year, with our new bass player, at Patrick Sullivan's on Friday, February 12th? No? Well...someone should.) After a few minutes he says it could be the motherboard but I should try messing with the RAM again just to make sure. So I remove all four sticks of RAM and replace them one by one, with restarts in-between, and.......it works. Sweet dark chocolate covered nipples it works!I equally love and hate computers. I feel like getting Love and Hate tattooed on my fingers but not on the knuckles like everyone else. I want them tattooed on my finger tips so I can
Flawless and non-consequential plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)